Core question: “What have I investigated about this question, and what did I find?”
A living investigation that grows through active research. Contains form-typed sections — each section carries its own is_a:: predicate identifying what kind of garden node it would become when extracted. The research form depletes over time: as findings extract into standalone garden nodes, the research note’s value migrates outward. A fully extracted research note has done its job.
Distinguished from two related forms:
The typical lifecycle: an Inquiry poses a question → a Research form investigates it → form-typed sections extract into standalone Models, Patterns, Glosses, Decisions → the Research form depletes, leaving provenance links.
A research form requires these sections in order:
Overview — What prompted this investigation, what question is being explored, and a provisional orientation. The overview frames but does not argue. “The answer appears to be X rather than Y” invites revision; a thesis resists it. State enough for the reader to follow the investigation without committing to a conclusion the findings haven’t yet earned.
Form-typed sections — Each finding organized as a named section with its own is_a:: predicate and structural contract. Sections use ### Form-Type: Descriptive Title headings. Each section is independently extractable. Per-section #### Sources track evidence for that finding.
Research Gaps — Unanswered questions, areas needing further investigation. Well-defined gaps may become Inquiry forms.
Sources — Aggregated sources from all sections.
Relations — Note-level typed predicates connecting to other vault and garden nodes.
Extracted Garden Nodes — Extraction manifest using source_of:: predicates. Lists all form-typed sections as extraction targets, tracking which have been extracted and which remain embedded.
Form-typed sections follow their target form type’s structural contract. A section marked is_a::[\[\[Pattern Form\]\]](Pattern%20Form.html) should have Context, Forces, Solution, Consequences. A section marked is_a::[\[\[Model Form\]\]](Model%20Form.html) should have elements and relationships.
Academic papers argue a position: thesis → evidence → conclusion. Research forms investigate a question and produce garden nodes. The distinction matters:
A research form that hardens into arguing a single position has probably found a Decision or Conviction, not more research to do.
Topic of investigation + architectural or domain framing. “Research Graphs and Precinct Architecture” not “Notes on Cornelius Article.”
Research forms have a lifecycle distinct from other garden forms:
has_status::[\[\[Growing Stage\]\]](Growing%20Stage.html).source_of:: / extracted_from:: provenance pair. The extraction manifest tracks progress.has_status::[\[\[Evergreen Stage\]\]](Evergreen%20Stage.html) — the note is complete, not abandoned.A research form that never depletes may actually be a Reference — a static briefing that doesn’t produce standalone nodes.
is_a::[\[\[Research Form\]\]](Research%20Form.html)has_status::[\[\[Seed Stage\]\]](Seed%20Stage.html), [\[\[Growing Stage\]\]](Growing%20Stage.html), or [\[\[Evergreen Stage\]\]](Evergreen%20Stage.html)in_domain::[\[\[Deep Context Architecture\]\]](../domains/Deep%20Context%20Architecture.html)source_of::[[Extracted Form]]↑ — tracks what was extracted from this researchextends::[\[\[Inquiry Form\]\]](Inquiry%20Form.html) — the inquiry that drove this investigationrelates_to::[\[\[Citation Form\]\]](Citation%20Form.html) — sources consulted during researchGenerative form — research produces other garden nodes. Paired with Inquiry Form: inquiries pose questions, research forms investigate them.
Research Form nodes live in Garden/research/, parallel to other form-type subfolders.
The Research Form structure works for operational research placed in Research/ rather than Garden/research/. In this mode, form-typed sections with is_a:: predicates serve as structural labels organizing findings by knowledge type — but the sections are not extraction targets. The extraction manifest describes the document’s structure without implying future garden node creation.
This dual mode reflects the form’s portability: the structural contract (overview, form-typed sections, research gaps, sources, relations) organizes any investigation, whether it feeds the garden graph or serves a handoff.