Core question: “What does this specific source or concept mean?”
An interpretive annotation anchored to particular sources. Thesis-driven synthesis with organized citations. The atomic unit of interpretation. A gloss interprets what specific sources or concepts mean — it doesn’t record a choice (decision), state a constraint (principle), or generalize from experience (pattern).
Stable once written; may spawn new glosses as understanding deepens.
A gloss form requires:
Naming heuristic: source + thesis. Mix based on how strong the interpretation is — a gloss dominated by one source foregrounds the source name; one making a novel synthesis foregrounds the thesis.
is_a::[[Gloss Form]]has_status::[[Seed Stage]] or [[Growing Stage]]in_domain::[[Deep Context Architecture]]extracted_from::[[Source Document]] — provenance with optional line numbersrelates_to::[[Related Form]] — lateral connectionsdefines_vocabulary_from::[[Source]] — when defining terms from decisions or researchStructural form — captures how things relate and what we understand.
Definition from [[Deep Context as an Architecture for Captured Reasoning]], lines 65-66.